I was on team two (the pro-mass media team), and according to my notes, team one made the following arguments
Question 2
1. Focuses on biased opinions- There is no such thing as total objectivity. Therefore, how could one expect it from the media?
2. Shows negative stereotypes- Can also demonstrate the inaccuracies of stereotypes
3. Increases materialism- Has materialism been defined as a bad thing? Materialism increases a country's economy and the global economy.
4. In some countries, the gatekeepers are the government- In such cases, people often find a way around it, like in Egypt.
5. Not everyone has access/interest- True, but if mass media is 'bad', wouldn't that be a positive thing for those who do not have access? Also, those who do have access often use it for productive or positive reasons, and to advocate for those who are disadvantaged. (Example: Egypt)
6. The dominant ideology suppresses the marginalized groups- While this is true, one must remember that there are sometimes TV channels, radio stations, online communities and so forth that serve as an outlet for the marginal groups. (Example: The Maori broadcasting agency "Te Māngai Pāho") Get more information here: http://www.tmp.govt.nz/index.html
Question 3
1. Focuses on extremes -Sometimes, extremes can be very helpful in ushering in social change. (Mass media coverage of Egyptian protests)
2. Often one-sided- This is very similar to question 2, argument 1, and I would apply the same rebuttal. However, in addition, the viewer chooses what sources they get their information from, which often exposes them to multiple sides of an issue.
3. Doesn't show the 'middle crowd'- I don't believe that is true. An example of this would be Modern Family, which depicts a family that is not considered 'typical' but has become a more common occurrence. Also, the TV show Community depicts a community college experience, rather than the mainstream idea of attending a prestigious college/university.
Photo retrieved from http://www.toothpastefordinner.com/archives/2008/Feb/
I really appreciate how you organized your arguments and rebuttals. I think it was helpful in allowing me to understand what your message was and it really aided in how you made your point. It was easier to read and comprehend.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Valeria, I too liked the way that you organized and structured your arguments and rebuttals.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with you, and you have very well though out rebuttals and bring up good points. =)
I love #5. I believe that if media is considered in my eye to be a bad thing, then for people who do not have it should be greatful. It is media that is driving certain groups to excel before something in the economy changes according to the media. It does give awareness but people don't want to hear about statistics and numbers.They want to hear about ways to better themselves as well as the person next to them. Everything has to be about a right or wrong, left or right. I wish the media could be more relatable and positive so people feel like they are aprt of the things going on around them and not just when someone wants a vote or some money for relief.
ReplyDelete